Saturday, 22 December 2012

Assange Christmas Speech




I attended Julian Assange's christmas speech on Thursday which marked 6 months since he entered the Ecuadorian embassy. I went because I believe in Wikileaks and I believe Assange is being pursued unjustly and unlawfully. I went alone because it's Christmas party season and my few friends who care about this case were either attending or hung over from Christmas parties.

I couldn't see how many people were there, 100? maybe 200 including police and media, a chilling reminder of how few people in London care about this case. The people who were there were in a jovial mood, holding candles, passing around mulled wine, singing Christmas carols and a nice rendition of I Shall Be Released (here's another good version). There was a strong police presence but from what I saw they were respectful, goons following orders, but respectful.

The awaiting crowd gave out a large cheer as Assange emerged from behind a curtain and onto the balcony. 1 hand raised aloft, a symbol of his defiance, absorbing the atmosphere he started:

"Good evening London,
what a sight for sore eyes,
people ask 'what gives me hope?'
Well the answer is right here".

At this point Julian is distracted by a knob with a megaphone who turned out to be from Channel 4 trying to get an interview with Assange, journalism Jackass style. I fully recognise the irony of Assange supporters, the protectors of free speech, yelling "shut up" to a journalist, sometimes you just have to laugh at life. Inigo Gilmore later explains that Channel 4 have been trying to get a 1 on 1 interview with Assange for 6 months to no avail and goes on to say "he seems to be avoiding the media even though he sees himself as a torch bearer for freedom of speech". Well that is simply not true, the real reason Assange has refused an interview is probably because of Channel 4's deliberate distortion of the facts surrounding this case. Plus he has been busy.

The highlight of the speech was Assange's announcement that Wikileaks will be releasing 1 million documents in 2013 which will "affect every country in the world", vague and threatening language which will send chills through the bones of anyone in government. They will be thinking, "What have they got their hands on now? Which one of our vicious lies, which one of my dirty little secrets are they about to expose?"

The final words were a touching plea to everybody on Earth to stay educated and hold on to their humanity.

"For once we, the people, stop speaking out and stop dissenting, once we are distracted or pacified, once we turn away from each other, we are no longer free. For true democracy is the sum – is the sum – of our resistance.

If you don’t speak up – if you give up what is uniquely yours as a human being: if you surrender your consciousness, your independence, your sense of what is right and what is wrong, in other words – perhaps without knowing it, you become passive and controlled, unable to defend yourselves and those you love.

People often ask, “What can I do?”

The answer is not so difficult.

Learn how the world works. Challenge the statements and intentions of those who seek to control us behind a façade of democracy and monarchy.

Unite in common purpose and common principle to design, build, document, finance and defend.

Learn. Challenge. Act.

Now."



Thursday, 20 December 2012

Assange 6 Months on

This week marks the 6 month anniversary of Julian Assange entering the Ecuadorian embassy, one of many twists in this extremely complicated case.

I'll make my stance immediately clear, I think Julian Assange should be allowed to leave the UK and should be free to fulfil his latest ambition to run for the Australian senate. Bradley Manning who turned 25 this week after 3 years in prison without charge is a hero and should be released. The people responsible for his unlawful treatment in Quantico should be brought to justice. I know that neither of these are going to happen in a hurry but I think history will look kindly upon these two courageous individuals.

When you see all the evidence stacked up it's hard to draw any conclusion other than this is a conspiracy of the tallest order involving some of the most powerful and influential people and organisations in the world. Co-operation on an unprecedented scale between governments, agencies & corporations across multiple nations to bring down 1 organisation hell bent on spreading the truth.

Wikileaks first came to my attention after I saw the Collateral Murder video. Bradley Manning first came to my attention after I read the chat logs with Lamo, and subsequently the full chat logs. The sequence of events from the initiation of Wikileaks until August 2012 shows a direct correlation between Wikileak's continued exposing of Government secrets and the legal pressure on Assange. 

It is hard to have an opinion on the Assange sexual assault allegations due to Sweden's reluctance to charge Assange. Seeking extradition for questioning seems unnecessary in the digital age but the most interesting thing I've heard is that once Sweden charge Assange they need to give the defence access to their evidence. This will allow the defence to expose how flimsy that evidence is, case closed. Let's not forget they have dropped these charges once before.

If Assange is extradited the case will be heard behind closed doors and the full truth will never see the light of day. It is likely that once in Sweden, Assange will be extradited to the US where he would be subjected to treatment as harsh if not worse than that of Bradley Manning, he could even face the death penalty. The circle is complete when you understand that Wikileaks once hosted their data in Sweden due to their laws on the protection of sources.

Tonight Julian will be speaking from the balcony of the Ecuadorian embassy and I will be in attendance. This case is too important for anyone to ignore, but Masterchef is on at the same time, so I can understand why people won't bother going.

Here is a collection of some of my favourite Assange related links:
To keep up to date with the case I recommend following Christine Assange and Glenn Greenwald on Twitter.

Saturday, 15 December 2012

Prime Minister's Questions

Watching Prime Minister's Questions always fills me with a flurry of mixed emotions, mostly negative.

The format is ultimately flawed. When anyone asks a question it is usually dodged & spun to a statistic conveniently laid out on David Cameron's cheat sheet. After the question is successfully avoided, it's on to the next person for another pointless enquiry. The speaker (who is completely superfluous but for shouting "oww der") should not let the PM proceed until the question is adequately answered.

My favourite is when a Conservative asks a question in the following format: "So, Mr PM, isn't it brilliant I stood up right now and said exactly what was asked of me, aren't I good, aren't I?" Replied forthwith "I thank the honourable gentleperson for their question and changing the topic entirely from the prior question I failed to even remotely answer, 100% of people would like to hear the next question please."

It's Pythonesque.

If you only listened to the audio of Prime Minister's Questions you could easily mistake the background jeering for the annual varsity Oxford vs Cambridge Rugby match. This unruly uncivilised format of PMQs is a relatively new thing, born in the Wilson/Heath era in the 70's and sadly continues to this day.

I don't know what world these people grew up in but in the society they govern no matter how much you disagree with someone you generally hear them out before you jeer them (if only to revel more in their relative stupidity). Drowning out the sounds of your opponent is a sign of fear and weakness.

PMQs could easily be the most interesting 30 minutes of television a week but it has been turned in to an absolute pointless shambles.

Don't let them win, someone needs to keep an eye on these bastards.